Who Cares?

Who Cares?

MANY TIMES over the years Hal tried to get help, all to no avail. The authorities he contacted at local, state and federal levels would do nothing to investigate, assist or protect him. In light of everything of which he became aware and being at a point of desperation, he thought it best to try again, but not in the normal way that previously produced no results.

Perhaps he should not have been surprised that his new and different attempts were likewise unproductive. It was apparently OK for all those he contacted to cop out and knowingly allow Hal to continue to suffer alone and unaided, and for them to ignore references to something that is hurting America that they could have and should have taken action to help cure.

What is foremost here is called Toleration. In the military it is considered a significant crime. In society it is far worse than a crime; it fuels horrendous atrocities that over centuries have twisted the core of civilization as we know it and, sadly, continues to do so.

When cruel and harmful activities are observed being perpetrated upon the innocent and the observer takes no action in opposition or supports those activities, the observer effectively serves as an accomplice. If you know something is wrong, say something – or do something!

Of course in America, if you do the right thing under such circumstances you can become a victim of the System, as is Hal. Toleration is widespread and its’ silent but catastrophic effect has putrefied the roots of democracy.

MOST EVERYONE KNOWS WHO IS SUPPOSED TO CARE. But they don’t know that most that are supposed to care really do not.

ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL LANNY BREUER

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE CRIMINAL DIVISION

RE: REQUEST FOR ASSISTANCE

”This writing is intended to bring to your attention a veil of fraud that covers America, blocks detection of significant ongoing political corruption and supports the victimization of competent fraud investigators through covert imposition of cruel and unusual punishment.”

Hal was turned on by some of the things Breuer said in a published interview[i] and was thinking he might be the right person to contact for help and justice. Breuer said he had “a distinctly American passion for the rule of law and the pursuit of justice.” He also said, “Corruption weakens political institutions and threatens democratic stability.”

That being so, if he agreed to take action to restore Hal’s civil and human rights and punish the perpetrators who attack him, Breuer would effectively have initiated action that could lead to the reinstatement of true democracy in America.

And as to fraud examiners in general, Breuer made the following significant remark: “. . . when (fraud examiners) see something that doesn’t look right, they should do something about it.”

Yes, but is the Justice Department aware that if they do something about it they can be destroyed, and have no protection or support from our government?

Hal added; (Not associated with the Hal Rosenthal political figure in Pennsylvania) and P.S. I have nothing against the Clintons; only the System that may control they as well as me.

No response!

[1] “THE AGGRESSIVE ENFORCER, an interview with Lanny Breuer, Assistant Attorney General for the U.S. Department of Justice Criminal Division” . . . as appeared in the May/June 2011 edition of the Fraud Magazine, a publication of the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE).

THE HOUSE COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND GOVERNMENT REFORM

Included in Hal’s letter to Representative Issa;

“I write this letter to you as a plea for help and an offer of assistance because you are the chairman of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and I do so at great risk. I saw you on TV today. Coincidentally, Lanny Breuer has not responded to my most recent written request for help.”

“While conducted mainly under cover, the ‘conspiracy’ and punishment-without-trial activities is not a mere theory, and is quite provable given an appropriate and impartial – and long overdue – investigation; in this instance to be greatly aided by the unique combination of my extensive experience in fraud investigation and the providing of litigation support services and, importantly, access to the findings derived as a result of my long-term victimization.”

No response!

ASSOCIATION OF CERTIFIED FRAUD EXAMINERS (ACFE):

Hal sent Mr. Wells a letter on March 11, 2011. In it he wrote, “This writing is intended to bring to your attention a veil of fraud that covers America, blocks detection of significant ongoing political corruption and supports the victimization of competent fraud investigators through covert imposition of cruel and unusual punishment.”

On March 17, 2011, at 3:25pm EDT, Hal telephoned Joseph Wells and reached his female assistant “Lindsay” (Phonetic). She told Hal that Wells said “there is nothing I can do.”

JUDICIAL WATCH:

Hal sent a letter to the Judicial Watch president, Tom Fitton, dated March 3, 2011. The heading read, “Re: Political corruption and related violation of my civil and human rights.” Its content included an edited How It Is (and omitted the first paragraph) and the redacted version of Out of Anger.

Also included was, “So as to establish a basis of my credibility please refer to my websites, www.askhal.com and my newer one, www.testtubesofpaper.com. Also, please know that with reasonable support I am prepared to prove any and all representations. As an experienced expert witness, I am not in the habit of saying things that I cannot substantiate.

A Mr. Lyon told Hal he would pass the matter “up the line” and that Hal would get a call-back in about a week (using the then active “burn phone” telephone number Hal provided).

Having heard nothing from Judicial Watch, Hal left a polite voicemail message for Lyon on March 15^th and read off part of a legal citation he had found on the internet, which confirmed that the statute of limitations period for taking legal action for conspiracies begins with the time of the latest act (in this case, January/February of 2011).

But again having obtained no response whatever from Judicial Watch, on March 24^th Hal left yet another voicemail for Mr. Lyon asking to please be advised of the status of the matter.

So what could it be? Judicial Watch decided to pass, but in this case without giving Hal even the courtesy of any reply? Or, the bad guys got to Judicial Watch?

THE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE, JOHN BOEHNER -

He was faxed (513-779-5315) a copy of “How It Is” with the following added;

Please help me!! May I communicate with you via a “safe” phone?

There has been no resultant offer to help or to even listen to Hal.

THE SAME WAS SENT TO REPRESENTATIVE ALLEN WEST, 202-225-8398. Hal hoped to receive a reply. But again, nothing!

ALLEN WEST, Hal thought, was a new member of congress and not yet spoiled by the System; he would be a good candidate to look into the matter!

Hal followed up at the end of the week by making an unannounced visit to West’s government office in Plantation, Florida. It would have been unwise to call or email. An attractive blonde woman wearing dark slacks and a white blouse buzzed him in. She invited him to sit on the sofa next to the wall to the left of the glass doors of the ground floor office.

West wasn’t there but the lady took plenty of time speaking with Hal about what was going on. She said she would read what he gave her (How It Is and a redacted version of Out of Anger).

On March 1^st, 2011, he telephoned 954-202-6211 and spoke for about sixteen minutes with “Kelley.” She said it was she, and not Cathy or Kathy with whom Hal had met. The key point she communicated was that Allen West is not permitted to take any action on Hal’s matter because Hal does not geographically reside in West’s jurisdiction.

Instead, she said “the normal procedure would be to transfer Hal’s documents to Congressman Ted Deutch” - a Democrat. Hal asked that she not do that and Kelly offered to hold the documents in her bottom drawer till Hal decides what he wants.

She also said there is a conflict; West can act on matters of legislature but not matters of justice – they are two separate functions.

On March 7^th Hal called Kelly and asked her to shred the documents. She wished Hal the best of luck and sounded sincere.

That was it. Weird! What was learned here? - if a United States Congressman found out that something harmful to America was taking place or that some of its citizens were victims of cruel and unusual punishment imposed upon them without the benefit of trial and contrary to the Constitution, he would ignore it because the victim(s) lived several miles out of his jurisdiction and/or matters of justice are none of his business!

ANOTHER GOVERNMENT AGENCY: After being told that “we have no authority to look into the matter.”

Extracts from Hal’s email to the agent:

Thank you for interviewing me today in connection with my claim of violation of my rights and of other crimes against me. Per our discussion, attached find further information I believe to be appropriate for consideration.

Respectfully submitted,

EXTORTION - The use, or the express or implicit threat of the use, of violence or other criminal means to cause harm to person, reputation, or property as a means to obtain property from someone else with his consent. USC 18

The Hobbs Act defines "extortion" as "the obtaining of property from another, with his consent, induced by wrongful use of actual or threatened force, violence, or fear, or under color of official right." 18 U.S.C. S 1951(b)(2).

PROPERTY - Not only money and other tangible things of value, but also includes any intangible right considered as a source or element of income or wealth.

Note that the victim of extortion is not only me but also the various law-firms that were illegally induced to disengage me (albeit under the color of official law). If you wish to obtain the names of the perpetrators it is a simple matter to accomplish that task; just interview one or more of the law firms and, based upon the protection afforded them by your credentials, they will tell you.